Always collaborating to achieve their goals, the need and eventual act of moving on alone has marked not only the most successful of American rock ‘n roll stars, but the most lasting. It’s this great desire to “head on out” that tells us the history of rock ‘n roll.
Legends aplenty have sprung up around this need to strike out on one’s own (Dylan’s electrified Newport Folk Fest, Springsteen jumping the fence at
Americans need a maverick, someone to show us the way without knowing it. We want to be surprised, but only in a certain way. The performers that mark our Rock and Roll History are generally single figures, though backed by a solid cast of characters. Elvis, Chuck Berry, Ray Charles, Little Richard (Who would kill me if he found out he wasn’t first), Jerry Lee Lewis, Tom Petty, The Coug, Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan are all a part of that great tradition. It’s definitely not pointed out frequently that most of
But why Rock and Roll, why not any of the other genres? Rock is certainly the most bastardized of the American musics, taking on just about any form that it wants to, but again, it is the form with the most promise. Although it does not deliver on the togetherness that Country, Soul, and even Jazz can, it speaks more toward the future than any other genre. Country at its best is a simple state of the union; Soul is a reassuring pat on the back, no matter how warming or confident; and Jazz is the Classical Music, the high art, the peak of creativity of
While that declaration of independence is so important to rock music, the stuff that has lasted has had more of a revolutionary tone, as opposed to just a rebellious one. This is why rock is so lonely, and why its history has been carved out and laid down by single figures and not groups. All too often one finds themselves the prisoner of their own hopes or dreams, as the protagonist does in John Fogerty’s “Lodi,” (“I played my songs whil people sat there drunk”) or the son in Springsteen’s “Independence Day” (“I won’t let them do what I watched them do to you”). Yes, these are characters that seemed to have lost everything, but there is the hope and promise that something will come along to liberate them. The promise is never fulfilled at once, but more in the journey that follows.
It’s problematic to say who has taken that journey, and how that journey can be charted. Certainly, there are those performers that have hidden their own voices behind others, using their bandmates as a mirror through which we can see them. Tweedy has tweaked the line-up of Wilco several times during their ten-year career, using up collaborators until he’s ready for something new. In other cases, performers use their ever-changing personal perspectives to keep the listeners guessing, or at the very least, following them, leaving a legacy for the critics to sort out. Dylan has made his career by keeping us guessing. But most every American performer tries to sort themselves out in whatever way they see as possible, giving their listeners and fans alike a little bit of what they expect, a little of what they don’t, and a lot of themselves. The singular voices in American Rock music are always trying to discover themselves by looking to their listeners, and vice-versa. They are trying to be us and, beyond any pop-star fantasies, we are trying to be them. We identify with Dylan because although he puts words together in a way that we could only hope to someday understand, he does it on his own. Springsteen gives us the hope that we, too, will some day break out of the mold of our fathers and mothers and build something greater and more lasting. The thing that we like to do most is our own thing, and that could be anything. We want to stand out, and move against what everyone else is doing, but make it look like we don’t care. Jeff Tweedy gives us that chance with every new Wilco album, breaking the expectations of everyone, being the most successful when he isn’t even trying.
It’s one thing to say that a performer is trying to be us, or at the very least to relate to us, but it’s that search to give people what they want that makes American performers so unique (I think it also sets us up for a lot of failure later on, but who remembers The Grays?). We want be our own men and women, and as much as we identify with single figures, music is made at its best by groups. We do not have a history of practical socialism in our country, so we think we can do it by ourselves. We can’t.
The truth of the matter is that Americans want to, but simply cannot, stand completely alone. Certainly, the pulling apart makes for great music, but as is the case, single performers make strides on their own, and then find a group to follow the dream down. Dylan starts to hint at this with Bringing’ It All Back Home and follows through on Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on Blonde. A recording like “It’s all over now, Baby Blue” aches for more instrumentation (although the recent Scorsese Documentary kind of proves this wrong), leading to tracks like “Desolation Row,” and even “I Want You.” Dylan’s true power comes from the fact that he roars every line as if he’s shouting through the din of a noisy bar, even in the most intimate of settings. Springsteen too, would follow this formula on his first record Greetings from Asbury Park, New Jersey certainly mimicking Dylan, but not realizing that that was the only way for an American to do it. Some of the most exciting records in the history of Rock music have this strange balance of sound empty, yet totally full-blown. Wilco’s 1996 sophomore release, Being There straddles the same fence. Songs that seem to come from one person yet don’t feel right without a full band.
The paradox is as was said before; the leaders must stay ahead, but not too far. They cannot stray from sight, but walk their own path. As Americans, we have always upheld the lonely and forgotten, because that is the very core of our being. We don’t have the great partnerships of old. We are Dylan, we are Springsteen, we are Jeff Tweedy. They are everything we want to be, they are exiled in